Yanick Toutain wrote:
[snip rest of crap]

> Michelson and Morley and Miller were wrong about that: They ignored
> the motion of the Sun.

   1) Michelson-Morley, 1887, no aether to differential 10^(-8)

   2) 2002, no aether to differential 1.7x10^(-15), 

Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)

   3) 2007, no aether to differential 10^(-16),

http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 050401 (2007)

Two simultaneous interferometers ==> over a year's observation <==:
Optical in Berlin, Germany at 52�31'N 13�20'E and microwave in Perth,
Australia at 31�53'S 115�53E. An aether background could never be at
rest relative to both of them.  No vacuum dispersion, no vacuum
dichroism.

   4) Fucking imbecile.

-- 
Uncle Al 
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ 
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) 
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2