Michael Helland wrote:
> On May 1, 5:24 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:

>>    See:http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/SR/experi...
>>    Sections 4 and on...
> 
> 
> Basically that says that space and time as they are studied in science
> are relative.
> 
> Again, I point you to Newton's definition, which says that what we
> observe is relative space:
> 
> "Relative space is some movable dimension or measure of the absolute
> spaces; which our senses determine by its position to bodies;"
> 
> If, by definition, all observations of space are relative space, the
> only way to prove Newton's definition wrong is to observe absolute
> space.
> 
> Which your cite says is impossible.
> 
> Newton's definition of relative time and Einstein's definition of time
> are identical.

   You are pretty confused.
   What level of mathematics can you handle?