自己沒知識,也多看看別人的貼文...

if adults in Europe were to consume chocolates and biscuits containing contaminated milk powder, they would not exceed the TDI (Tolerable Daily Intake) of 0.5 mg/kg body weight,

0.5 mg/kg是多少?

所以 0.5 mg/kg (0.5 毫克/公斤) = 0.5 ppm < 聯合報記者唬爛的 2.5 ppm


http://www.efsa.eu.int:80/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1211902098433.htm

EFSA assesses possible risks related to melamine in composite foods from China
25/09/2008
Following recent events in China, the European Commission asked the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to provide urgent scientific advice on health risks for European consumers related to the possible presence of melamine[1] in composite foods
containing milk or milk products originating from China.

EFSA’s scientists today issued a statement saying that if adults in Europe were to consume chocolates and biscuits containing contaminated milk powder, they would not exceed the TDI (Tolerable Daily Intake) of 0.5 mg/kg body weight, even in worst case
scenarios[2].

Children with a mean consumption of biscuits, milk toffee and chocolate made with such milk powder would also not exceed the TDI. However, in worst case scenarios with the highest level of contamination, children with high daily consumption of milk
toffee, chocolate or biscuits containing high levels of milk powder would exceed the TDI. Children who consume both such biscuits and chocolate could potentially exceed the TDI by up to more than three times.

High levels of melamine can primarily affect the kidneys. EFSA applied the TDI of 0.5 mg/kg body weight for melamine in a specific case of contamination in 2007[3].

The Commission requested EFSA to focus its assessment on biscuits and chocolate which contain milk powder as such products can be imported from China. EFSA developed theoretical exposure scenarios based on European consumption figures[4] of biscuits and
chocolate. In the absence of available data for contaminated milk powder, EFSA also used the highest value of melamine, reported in Chinese infant formula as a basis for worst case scenarios. EFSA stressed that it is not known at the moment whether such
theoretical high level exposure scenarios could occur in Europe.



==> 在 sppben@cis_nctu (有夠俗) 的文章中提到:
> 我看的是聯合報
> 聯合報有明確刊登出來
> 我的確沒有去歐盟的網站去確認
> 我不是食品專家
> 根本不知道那裏可以找到這個資料
> 反過來說
> 你又去歐盟網站確認過了嗎??
> 如果你有本事拿到歐盟的標準
> 你不僅可以拿來糾正我
> 更可以修理聯合報
> 歡迎你去歐盟的網站找到這些資料
> 歡迎你去歐盟的網站下載這些資料來糾正我和修理聯合報
> ==> 在 joec2@cis_nctu (新殼) 的文章中提到:
> > 請問你說歐盟的2.5ppm的檢驗標準是來自於哪裡？
> > 請把歐盟網站的文章連結貼出來昭信於人
> > 如果是某媒體放的話 那就不足採信
--
 * Origin: ★ 交通大學資訊科學系 BBS ★ <bbs.cis.nctu.edu.tw: 140.113.23.3>